A licensed nationwide Internet Service Provider delivering secure, high-performance connectivity since 2010
Established in 2010, ICC Communication Limited is a Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (BTRC) licensed nationwide Internet Service Provider. We deliver carrier-grade connectivity solutions for homes, enterprises, financial institutions, and government organizations.
Our redundant backbone infrastructure, Multiple Points of Presence (PoPs), and fully staffed 24/7 Network Operations Center ensure uninterrupted service, low latency, and enterprise-level reliability across fiber, wireless, and satellite networks.
To deliver reliable, secure, and cost-effective ICT solutions nationwide through advanced technology and customer-focused service excellence.
To empower Bangladesh’s digital future by enabling seamless connectivity, innovation, and inclusive access to information.
Is Tarzan: Shame of Jane good? No. Not by any traditional metric.
Is it entertaining? In a so-bad-it’s-hilarious way, absolutely. The dialogue is pure cheese (“Jane shame. Tarzan no shame. Tarzan… free.”). The musical interludes are bizarre Casio-keyboard ballads. And the voice acting ranges from “overly dramatic” to “sounds like they recorded this in a closet between sandwiches.”
Let’s be honest: this was made on a budget that might have bought a used car. The animation is stiff, with lots of panning over still images, repeated frames, and characters who move like wooden puppets. The jungle backgrounds are surprisingly lush—almost rotoscoped from stock footage—but the character designs are pure 90s adult comic: exaggerated proportions, pouty lips, and vines that conveniently wrap around everything at cinematic moments.
Before you rush to Google, let me save you the trouble: No, this is not a lost Disney sequel. It’s not a Filmation classic, nor is it related to the 1999 animated Tarzan . Instead, Shame of Jane occupies a strange, forgotten corner of the adult animated parody boom—specifically, the “erotic parody” boom that followed the success of Ralph Bakshi and the underground comix movement.
If you grew up in the 90s, you probably remember the golden age of direct-to-video animation. Studios like Disney were dominating the box office, and everyone else was desperately trying to catch the coattail—often with bizarre, low-budget results.
Is Tarzan: Shame of Jane good? No. Not by any traditional metric.
Is it entertaining? In a so-bad-it’s-hilarious way, absolutely. The dialogue is pure cheese (“Jane shame. Tarzan no shame. Tarzan… free.”). The musical interludes are bizarre Casio-keyboard ballads. And the voice acting ranges from “overly dramatic” to “sounds like they recorded this in a closet between sandwiches.”
Let’s be honest: this was made on a budget that might have bought a used car. The animation is stiff, with lots of panning over still images, repeated frames, and characters who move like wooden puppets. The jungle backgrounds are surprisingly lush—almost rotoscoped from stock footage—but the character designs are pure 90s adult comic: exaggerated proportions, pouty lips, and vines that conveniently wrap around everything at cinematic moments.
Before you rush to Google, let me save you the trouble: No, this is not a lost Disney sequel. It’s not a Filmation classic, nor is it related to the 1999 animated Tarzan . Instead, Shame of Jane occupies a strange, forgotten corner of the adult animated parody boom—specifically, the “erotic parody” boom that followed the success of Ralph Bakshi and the underground comix movement.
If you grew up in the 90s, you probably remember the golden age of direct-to-video animation. Studios like Disney were dominating the box office, and everyone else was desperately trying to catch the coattail—often with bizarre, low-budget results.
Our concerns operate across connectivity and digital services, supporting diverse customer and business requirements.
