Shipman’s primary argument in Womenomics (Shipman & Kay, 2009) rested on three observable trends. First, she noted that a growing number of highly educated women were voluntarily leaving or reducing their participation in full-time corporate careers, not due to lack of ambition, but because of rigid workplace cultures. Second, she argued that the 2008-2009 recession had fundamentally shifted corporate power dynamics, making employers more receptive to flexible work arrangements as a cost-saving and talent-retention strategy. Third, she proposed a new definition of success: one where women could “write their own rules” by negotiating for results-oriented work, telecommuting, and alternative career paths without apologizing for prioritizing family or personal well-being.
The late 2000s marked a pivotal moment in discussions about gender, professional ambition, and work-life integration. Among the influential voices during this period was Claire Shipman, particularly through her 2009 co-authored work Womenomics: Write Your Own Rules for Success . While the term “Shipman 2009” often encompasses her broader journalistic and research contributions around this time, her core argument centered on a then-novel proposition: that women could reshape the workplace not by conforming to existing male-dominated structures, but by leveraging changing economic and corporate realities to demand flexibility, purpose, and balance. This essay examines Shipman’s key theses from 2009, evaluates their empirical grounding, and assesses their lasting relevance in the post-pandemic professional landscape. shipman 2009 word format
Pedulla, D. S. (2016). Penalized or protected? Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. American Sociological Review , 81(2), 262–289. Shipman’s primary argument in Womenomics (Shipman & Kay,
Munsch, C. L. (2016). Flexible work, flexible penalties: The effect of gender, childcare, and type of request on the flexibility bias. Social Forces , 94(4), 1567–1591. Third, she proposed a new definition of success:
Shipman, C., & Kay, K. (2009). Womenomics: Write your own rules for success . HarperCollins.
Critically, Shipman (2009) distinguished her approach from earlier feminist workplace models. Unlike the “lean in” philosophy that would later gain prominence, Shipman did not suggest that women needed to adopt more assertive, linear career trajectories. Instead, she championed what she called “smart flexibility”—using economic leverage to create customized roles. She supported this with survey data indicating that over 60% of high-achieving women desired reduced schedules or remote work, but only a fraction felt empowered to ask for it. Her contribution was thus both descriptive (identifying the gap) and prescriptive (providing negotiation scripts and mindset shifts).
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By using this website, the user acknowledges and accepts the following:
There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; the user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use; the information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship. The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.